.

Thursday, March 28, 2019

The Failures of Affirmative Action :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

The Failures of approbatory Action Once upon a time, in that respect were two people who went to an interview for only one employment authority at the same company. The first person attended a prestigious and highly academic university, had years of work experience in the battleground and, in the mind of the employer, had the potential to make a positive touch on the companys performance. The second person was just starting out in the field and seemed to lack the ambition that was visible in his opponent. Who was chosen for the job? you ask. Well, if the story took place before 1964, the swear out would be obvious. How of all time, with the somewhat new-make adoption of the social policy known as affirmative action, the answer becomes unclear. After the United States Congress passed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, it became bare that certain business traditions, such as seniority status and readiness tests, prevented total equality in employment. Then President, Lyndon B. Johnson, decided something needed to be done to remedy these flaws. On September 24, 1965, he issued Executive show 11246 at Howard University that required federal contractors to take affirmative action to match that applicants are employed . . . without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin (Civil Rights). When Lyndon Banes Johnson gestural that order, he enacted one of the most discriminating pieces of legislature since the Jim Crow Laws were passed. Affirmative action was created in an effort to help minorities leap the discriminative barriers that were ever so put forward when the bill was first enacted, in 1965. At this time, the nation was in the wake of nationwide civil-rights demonstrations, and racial tension was at its peak. near of the corporate executive and managerial positions were occupied by white males, who controlled the hiring and ignition system of employees. The U.S. government, in 1965, believed that these employers were discriminat ing against minorities and believed that there was no better time than the present to bring about change. When the Civil Rights Law passed, minorities, especially African-Americans, believed that they should receive avenging for the years of discrimination they endured. The government responded by passing laws to aide them in attaining better employment as reprieve for the previous two 100 years of suffering their race endured at the hands of the white man. To many, this made sense.

No comments:

Post a Comment