Huntingtons’s Concept and Its Applicability to the Contemporary World Essay

Introduction Globalization and the disregard in the politics has entered a novel political schema after the orb state of war II and as such, it is has displace the interest of political theorists who had hoped to re-define and predict the time to come outcomes of global politics. Among the different approaches, what had really attracted the vigilance of the media and the interested crowd is Huntingtons design on the encounter of Civilizations theory.Huntingtons sterile claims and predictions regarding future tense outcomes of global relations had uncannily matched with that of the drastic event of the Al-Qaedas onrush on September 11 on the Twin Towers. The event, which had caught global attention,  is say to have been a direct pop-out from Huntingtons essay and that event was resultant of the brushing among the differing cultures of the the Statesn superpower and the Muslims of Afghanistan. The cultural conflict, albeit on global scale, would be the political patt ern after the Cold War.The examination is, is Huntingtons concept still relevant with the current apparent motion of globalization? hither at that place is a basic precondition that conflicts farm from ethnic differences and it is on these differences which testament feed the upcoming antagonism between the different nations. Al-Qaedas attack may have been likely accidental and that his reasons were not purely ethnic as in Huntingtons theory. In the paper, there is an attempt to investigate the flaws of Huntingtons meeting of Civilizations when placed in the larger consideration of globalization and international conflict.A primordial understanding of his paper first moldiness be placated followed by criticisms and the to a greater extent apt(predicate) model that would fit the current trend for global political system. s The Clash of Civilizations is a theory proposed by political scientist Samuel P. Huntington in 1993 as a answer to Fukuyamas book. Herein, Huntington e xpanded on the press of global patterns after the Cold War from the economic to traditional whereby conflicts are more of culture thicket.The globalization trend would intent in the traditional cultural smell and allow no longer be confounded on ideological clashes as in the philosophcal claims before. Huntingtons thesis is relatively simple to understand in the path that he had oversimplified and reduced everything It is my hypothesis that the fundamental first of conflict in this refreshful world leave alone not be trailly ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating root word of conflict will be cultural. tribe states will remain the most effective actors in world affairs, but the principal conflicts of global politics will continue between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future. His basic premise is the culture clash as a primary source of conflict and he divided the egg into different ethnic groups representing the different civilizations, each embodying different religion African, Hindu, Western, Sinic, Orthodox, Islamic, Latin America and Japanese.From these different ethnic frontiers, will arise the future conflicts and he had cited the cases of India and Pakistan. What is most intimidate of his perceptions is that the Superpower of America will looking a decline and the shift will be on the combined powers of Sino-Islamic group. equally daunting is Huntingtons concept that what had supply this antagonism is the purposive role of teology in the different civilizations, most particularly, that of the Islams.